To some,
the omens look bleak for Microsoft. PC shipments are in decline, and an
increasing proportion of IT activity bypasses Microsoft technology entirely.
Google and Apple continue to make massive inroads into, what was once, Microsoft
territory, forcing Microsoft to react.
Will the
trend towards consumerization and ‘Bring Your Own Device’ (BYOD) combined with
the move to cloud computing marginalize Microsoft and undermine the fabric of
its business model? Indeed, will cloud computing destroy Microsoft’s business
model and allow others such as Google and Apple to replace Microsoft within the
enterprise?
The
answer is no, if Microsoft can develop a coherent marketing strategy that can be understood by its clients. BYOD, cloud computing and the
vulnerabilities of Google and Apple’s business models give Microsoft the
opportunity to consolidate its dominance in the enterprise.
Windows
8 is an operating environment that can provide a common experience across multiple
devices. It can transform tablets into devices that can be used for enterprise
activities in addition to consumer activities. Windows 8 smartphones can also
be easily integrated with corporate Windows environments and offer management
and security features that enterprises are vigorously demanding.
Apple’s
presence in the enterprise is driven organically and is not planned. This may
benefit it in the short term, as it rides the consumerization trend. But, the
company does not have a coherent enterprise strategy, choosing to remain
focused on the consumer experience.
Google is developing an enterprise strategy
with some success. However, it does continue to generate the vast majority of
its revenues from advertising, not by addressing the technology needs of
enterprises. It does not have a suite of products that can compete with
Microsoft in the enterprise.
To the
enterprise, Microsoft represents much of what is deemed to be important such as
stability, long term product support, flexibility and standards. It offers
upgrade paths and a wide variety of support options to name a few benefits that
enterprises attribute to it.
So why is
Microsoft not seeing more success? Why is Windows 8 adoption so slow? Perhaps
this can be explained by Microsoft’s marketing. Microsoft’s marketing activity
does not reflect the strength of its position. Its message seems disjointed and
uncoordinated. For example, why did Microsoft not present the separate launches
of Windows 8 and the Surface as part of the same overall strategy? Its pricing strategy is muddled. It should aim to make Office 365 ubiquitous in the enterprise and then focus on pricing. So far, it has managed to upset a lot of customers with its Office 365 pricing and made alternatives more attractive.
Microsoft
will not beat Apple, Google or Samsung on their territories, by launching devices
to compete with them. Its advantage over these firms will be enhanced by leveraging
its strength in the enterprise market. In other words, it will succeed by
practicing the inverse of consumerization. Until the mid 1990s, mobile phones
were primarily used as enterprise devices. They moved from the enterprise, into
the consumer market. Similarly, PCs were first popularized in the enterprise
and thereafter became commonly used by consumers. Consumerization is a blip in
the technology adoption timeline. Are Apple’s recent challenges an indication
that it is struggling to manage a slowdown in the trend towards consumerization?
Microsoft
can galavanise a shift away from consumerization by promoting the benefits of
Windows 8 as an operating environment that can be used on any device. The
Surface should be primarily targeted at the enterprise not at the consumer.
Once established within the enterprise, workers will also use it for consumer
activities and its popularity as a consumer device will grow. Microsoft can
create a new market for an operating environment that straddles both enterprise
and consumer domains.
If
Microsoft cannot wait to strengthen its hand in the consumer market, it could
use its vast resources to make some acquisitions of firms that are pioneering
new ways of consuming content. For example, acquiring Spotify or Netflix would
instantly position Microsoft as a leader in the consumer market.
Microsoft
is in a very strong position. It needs to capitalize on this strength in order
to re-enforce its position. It must consolidate its enterprise position by
focusing on the needs of this huge market. It can then attack the consumer
market. It has some great products. It needs to market them more effectively. It needs to be seen by enterprise IT buyers as
the IT supplier that can offer one unified, secure, and manageable experience
across any device and that these devices can be used for both work and play. To date, it has failed to do this. With a revamped marketing strategy, the Microsoft empire can strike back.
No comments:
Post a Comment